Indiana Supreme Court, 1919

Advisory Board v. State ex rel. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided April 24, 1919 · Townsend

188 Ind. 331; 123 N.E. 108; 1919 Ind. LEXIS 48

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Davis v. State (Ind. 1920)
Getz v. Clough (Ind. Ct. App. 1922)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Townsend, J.

*3321. 2. *331— Appellee obtained a judgment of mandate against appellant. The complaint was in four paragraphs. . The trial court sustained demurrer to all, *332except the third. The cause was tried by jury on issue formed by answer to the third paragraph. Appellant says in its brief that it relies for reversal of the cause upon error of the court in overruling the demurrer to the third paragraph of the complaint. Appellant’s brief does not set out this paragraph of complaint; does not set out the demurrer thereto; does not set out memorandum attached to the demurrer; does not give any statement of the record by which this court can tell what its contentions are. Sub-division 5, Rule 22. §3, chapter 143, Acts 1917 p. 523, is void so far as briefing is concerned. Solimeto v. State (1919), ante 170, 122 N. E. 578.

Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 123 N. E. 108.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.