Rogers v. State
Rogers v. State
15 N.E.2d 86; 214 Ind. 705; 1938 Ind. LEXIS 237
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Rogers v. State
Opinion of the Court
—The lower court denied appellant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The sole ground relied upon for reversal is that the jury commissioners, who drew the grand jury, were not duly qualified for the reason that they, and each of them, did not qualify by taking an oath to support the Federal and State Constitutions.
The precise question here presented was decided adversely to appellant’s contention in the recent decision in Steinbarger v. State, ante 36, and Foreman v. State, ante 79.
Upon authority of these decisions the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.