Indiana Supreme Court, 1946

Hinton v. Youngblood

Hinton v. Youngblood
Indiana Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1946 · PER CURIAM.
63 N.E.2d 196; 224 Ind. 16; 1946 Ind. LEXIS 89 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Hinton v. Youngblood

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent to hear a petition for writ of error coram nobis. The response shows that the cause is not pending before respondent but before the judge who presided in the trial of the case at the time of relator’s conviction. Accordingly the petition is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 63 N. E. (2d) *196.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.