Bolden v. State

Indiana Supreme Court
Bolden v. State, 234 Ind. 708 (Ind. 1955)
130 N.E.2d 52; 1955 Ind. LEXIS 198
Achor, Arterburn, Bobbitt, Emmert, Landis

Bolden v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bobbitt, J.

Petitioner herein has attempted to perfect an appeal to this court under Bule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of error, nor do they contain any of the record necessary to present the questions which petitioner is apparently attempting to raise, nor does it in any other manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.

The petition is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court under Rule 2-40, and for this reason it should be dismissed. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.

Petition dismissed.

Emmert, C. J., Achor, Arterburn and Landis JJ., concur.

Note.—Reported in 130 N. E. 2d 52.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bolden v. State of Indiana
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published