Bolden v. State
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Moore v. Spann (Ind. Ct. App. 1973)
- Hogan v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
- Davidson v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division (Ind. Ct. App. 1963)
- Stamm v. PRICE (Ind. Ct. App. 1963)
- Ball Bros. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (Ind. Ct. App. 1961)
- Graue v. Brown (Ind. Ct. App. 1961)
- Anderson v. Anderson (Ind. 1956)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Petitioner has again attempted an appeal to this court under Rule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of errors nor proper bill of exceptions, nor do they in any other manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.
The assignment of errors constitutes petitioner’s complaint in this court. It is a requisite to any appeal, and without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon this court. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.
The petition herein is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Petition dismissed.
Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 301.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.