Indiana Supreme Court, 1960

State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided April 27, 1960

240 Ind. 705; 166 N.E.2d 335; 1960 Ind. LEXIS 254

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Wisemiller v. State (Ind. 1960)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

This is an original action for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to accept jurisdiction, *706hear and determine petitioner’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis, or show cause why the same should not be done.

Petitioner did not file his petition in quintuplícate, and it does not contain certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter. The petitioner does not allege that a copy of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis was ever filed with the Attorney General of Indiana and the Prosecuting Attorney of Lake County, Indiana. See: State ex rel. Powers v. Vigo C. C., Criss, J. et al. (1957), 236 Ind. 408, 413, 140 N. E. 2d 497; State ex rel. Sanders v. Reeves (1950), 228 Ind. 293, 295, 91 N. E. 2d 912.

Petitioner has failed to comply with Rule 2-35 and the petition should be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 166 N. E. 2d 335.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.