State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court
State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court
Opinion of the Court
This is an original action for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to accept jurisdiction,
Petitioner did not file his petition in quintuplícate, and it does not contain certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter. The petitioner does not allege that a copy of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis was ever filed with the Attorney General of Indiana and the Prosecuting Attorney of Lake County, Indiana. See: State ex rel. Powers v. Vigo C. C., Criss, J. et al. (1957), 236 Ind. 408, 413, 140 N. E. 2d 497; State ex rel. Sanders v. Reeves (1950), 228 Ind. 293, 295, 91 N. E. 2d 912.
Petitioner has failed to comply with Rule 2-35 and the petition should be dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Note. — Reported in 166 N. E. 2d 335.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court etc.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published