In re Bloom
In re Bloom
Opinion of the Court
ORDER APPROVING CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND IMPOSING PUBLIC REPRIMAND
Comes now the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Indiana and Bruce E. Bloom, Respondent in this cause, and pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(d), tender to this Court a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline”, which agreement more fully appears in words and figures as follows, to-wit:
(H. I.)
And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that Respondent was retained on May
This Court finds that, under the circumstances of this case, the agreed discipline, a public reprimand is appropriate. We find further that Respondent has complied with the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17(a) by delivering to this Court the requisite affidavit.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by this Court that the Conditional Agreement for Discipline tendered in this cause is now accepted and approved. In accordance with such agreement, the Respondent, Bruce E. Bloom, is to be given a public reprimand. Respondent is ordered to appear before this Court on August 12, 1980, at 1:30 P.M. at the Supreme Court Chambers to be publicly reprimanded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that prior to said appearance, Respondent shall pay to the Clerk of this Court the costs of this proceeding. The Clerk of this Court shall forward a copy of this Order to the parties in this action.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of Bruce E. BLOOM
- Status
- Published