Underwriting Members of Lloyds of London v. United Home Life Insurance
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- American General Finance Management Corp. v. Watson (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)
- Safety National Casualty Co. v. Cinergy Corp. (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)
- MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc. (Ind. 2004)
- National Serv-All, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (Indiana Tax Court 1994)
- Brougher Agency, Inc. v. United Home Life Insurance (Ind. Ct. App. 1993)
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Nickolick (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
This case arose after United Home Life sought reimbursement from Underwriting Members of Lloyds of London in accordance with certain reinsurance contracts. Lloyds refused payment, and United filed for declaratory judgment to construe the agreements. Lloyds asked the trial court to stay litigation pending arbitration. Instead, the trial court stayed arbitration pending the litigation.
The Court of Appeals reversed. Ruling on a question of first impression under Indiana’s Uniform Arbitration Act, Ind. Code §§ 34-4-2-1 to 22 (West 1983), the Court of Appeals held that the non-arbitra-ble issues in the lawsuit did not “permeate” the arbitration. It noted that the parties had contracted to arbitrate and that judicial economy would be advanced by having them do so. Lloyds of London v. United Home Life (1990), Ind.App., 549 N.E.2d 67.
The Court of Appeals correctly analyzed and resolved the issues presented in this case. We grant transfer and adopt their opinion. Ind. Appellate Rule 11(B)(3).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.