Indiana Supreme Court, 2005

In re Moore

In re Moore
Indiana Supreme Court · Decided June 16, 2005 · Admis, Boehm, Dickson, Disc, Has, Requirements, Resignation, Respondent, Rucker, Satisfied, Shepard, Sullivan
828 N.E.2d 1287; 2005 Ind. LEXIS 606; 2005 WL 1422298 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

In re Moore

Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING

Comes now the respondent, Lucinda Sherell Moore, and tenders to this Court her resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the tendered resignation satisfies the requirements of Admis.Disc.R. 28, Section 17, and that, accordingly, it should be accepted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the resignation from the bar of this State tendered by the respondent, Lucinda She-rell Moore, is hereby accepted. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to strike her name from the Roll of Attorneys. In order to be readmitted, she must *1288comply with the reinstatement provisions contained in Admis.Disce.R. 28, Section 4.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by virtue of the respondent's resignation from the bar of this State, any attorney disciplinary proceedings pending against her are hereby dismissed as moot.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondent or her attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc. R. 23, Section 3(d).

SULLIVAN, BOEHM and RUCKER, JJ., concur. SHEPARD, C.J. and DICKSON, J., dissent and would reject respondent's resignation, finding that she has not satisfied the requirements of Admis.Disc.R. 28, Section 17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.