1895
159 Court of Appeals of Kansas opinions from 1895.
- Hentig v. Collins 41 P. 1057, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Abbey v. McPherson 41 P. 978, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Rouse v. Redinger 41 P. 433, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. O'Melia 41 P. 437, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Connor v. Wilkie 41 P. 71, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Richards v. Griffith 41 P. 196, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Rouse v. Youard 41 P. 426, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Lee v. Ryder 41 P. 221, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Reese v. Rice 41 P. 218, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Whetstone v. Crane Bros. Manufacturing 41 P. 211, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Clark v. Goit 41 P. 214, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- City of Burlington v. Stockwell 41 P. 221, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Dwelling-House Insurance v. Osborn 40 P. 1099, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Bell v. Rankin 40 P. 1094, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Roe v. Board of County Commissioners 40 P. 1082, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Karr v. Burns 40 P. 1087, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Lane v. Woodruff 40 P. 1079, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Fuller v. Irvin 42 P. 1094, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Mannen v. Stebbins 40 P. 1085, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Wesner v. O'Brien 42 P. 1098, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Wilson v. Willey 42 P. 1092, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Worden v. Jones 40 P. 1071, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Peru Plow & Wheel Co. v. Ward 41 P. 64, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Steelsmith v. Union Pacific Railway Co. 40 P. 992, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Liverpool London & Globe Insurance v. Hall 41 P. 65, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Barnard & Leas Manufacturing Co. 41 P. 201, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- City of Concordia v. Hagaman 41 P. 133, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- German Insurance v. Hall 41 P. 69, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Groesbeck v. Barger 41 P. 204, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Kanopolis Land Co. v. Morgan 41 P. 205, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Chicago, Kansas & Western Railway Co. v. Bell 41 P. 209, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Surface v. Douglas 41 P. 207, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Halbert v. Ellwood 41 P. 67, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Moore v. Shaw 40 P. 929, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Oakland Home Insurance v. Allen 40 P. 928, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Grosch 40 P. 933, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- City of Topeka v. Thomas 40 P. 930, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Reardon 40 P. 931, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Paulucci v. J. H. Verity & Co. 40 P. 927, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Wurmser v. Stone 40 P. 993, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Midgett 40 P. 995, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Meixell v. Griest 40 P. 1070, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Stitt 40 P. 934, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Clark v. City of Ottawa 1 Kan. App. 304, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Bonebrake v. Ætna Life Insurance 41 P. 67, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Young v. Bell 40 P. 675, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Bell v. Fisher 40 P. 674, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Bridges v. Sargent 40 P. 823, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Armstrong v. Moore 40 P. 834, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)
- Brown v. School District No. 41 40 P. 826, (Kan. Ct. App. 1895)