District Court, D. Kansas, 1989

SEC v. Long

SEC v. Long
District Court, D. Kansas · Decided October 6, 1989 · Saffels
106 B.R. 697; 1989 WL 133256
SEC v. Long

Opinion

106 B.R. 697 (1989)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v.
Clarence E. LONG, H. Edward Tracy, and Joseph A. Lugo, Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 89-4075-S.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

October 6, 1989.

*698 Stephen Webster, Phillip W. Offill, Jr., S.E.C., Fort Worth, Tex., Benjamin L. Burgess, Jr., U.S. Atty., Richard L. Hathaway, Asst. U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff.

Joseph A. Lugo, pro se, New York City and Clarence E. Long, Boerne, Tex., pro se.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Clarence E. Long's motion to stay this litigation against him because of the commencement of a Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against him.

Normally a filing of a petition in bankruptcy operates as an automatic stay of pending civil actions against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). This automatic stay, however, does not operate to stay the continuation of an action by a governmental agency to enforce its police or regulatory powers. 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4).

The court finds that the present action is one brought by the SEC to enforce its police and regulatory powers. Thus, this litigation is not subject to the automatic stay under section 362(a).

IT IS BY THIS COURT THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Long's motion to stay this litigation is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.