District Court, D. Kansas, 2020

Cox v. Westport Insurance Corporation

Cox v. Westport Insurance Corporation
District Court, D. Kansas · Decided October 27, 2020
Cox v. Westport Insurance Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CONSOLIDATED CASES GERALD G. COX, Judgment Creditor, v. Case No. 20-4050 SCOTT SCHULTE and C.D. SCHULTE AGENCY, INC., Judgment Debtors, and WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Garnishee. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ WAYNE LAGALLE, Judgment Creditor, v. Case No. 20-4051 SCOTT SCHULTE and C.D. SCHULTE AGENCY, INC., Judgment Debtors, and WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Garnishee.

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION On October 27, 2020, the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, conducted a scheduling conference in the case captioned Cox v. Westport Ins. Corp., Case No. 20-4050. The parties agreed at the conference that the case is factually and legally related to the case captioned LeGalle v. Westport Ins., Corp., Case No. 20-4051, and that the two cases therefore should be consolidated for discovery and pretrial purposes.

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), a court may consolidate or join for trial or hearing Aany or all the matters at issue in the actions@ if the actions involve a Acommon question of law or fact.@ The decision whether to consolidate such actions is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.1 In exercising its discretion, the court should take into consideration whether judicial efficiency is best served by consolidation.2 Case Nos. 20-4050 and 20-4051 clearly involve common questions of law and fact.

The judgment debtors and garnishee are identical in both cases. The judgment creditors in both cases, though different, are both represented by Zackery E. Reynolds of the Reynolds Law Firm, who agrees the cases should be consolidated. The cases arise from similar facts and involve common legal issues. Both are garnishment actions in which a judgment creditor is seeking to collect from Westport Insurance Corp. a judgment obtained against Ryan Transp. Servs., Inc. v. Fleet Logistics, L.L.C., No. Civ. A. 04-2445-CM, 2005 WL 2293598, at *3 (D. Kan. Sept. 19, 2005) (citing Shump v. Balka, 574 F.2d 1341, 1344 (10th Cir. 1978)).

2 C.T. v. Liberal Sch. Dist., 562 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1346 (D. Kan. 2008).

Scott Schulte and C.D. Schulte Agency, Inc. Westport Insurance Corp. has denied liability for the judgments in both cases. Judicial efficiency would best be served by consolidation of these cases for all discovery and pretrial purposes.

In consideration of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Case No. 20-4050 shall be consolidated with Case No. 20-4051. The Clerk is directed to reassign Case No. 20-4051 to Kathryn H. Vratil, U.S. District Judge, and the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge. Case No. 20-4050 shall be designated as the lead case. All future pleadings, except for those related to dispositive motions, shall bear the consolidated caption on this order and shall be filed in only the lead case. Any dispositive motions and other filings related to the same shall be filed in the specific case without a consolidated caption.

Dated October 27, 2020, at Kansas City, Kansas.

s/ James P. O=Hara James P. O=Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.