Robitaille v. Furguson
Robitaille v. Furguson
Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
This is a proceeding in error, brought to reverse an order of the district court of Wyandotte county; dismissing an appeal taken by the plaintiff in error, from a judgment of a justice of the peace, because notice of such appeal had not been given, as required by the fifteenth rule, made and adopted by this court, under and by virtue of § 612 of the code. That portion of said rule 15 having reference to the point raised in this case, reads as follows: “In cases of appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace, or mayor or recorder of a city or village, the -appellant shall, within five days after the filing of the transcript of appeal in the district court, serve upon the appellee or appellees, his or their agent or attorney, notice in writing of the filing thereof.” This language is certainly very explicit, and easy to be understood; and moreover, the taste of giving timely notice of their appeal, here imposed upon appellants is, as it seems to us, entirely reasonable .and proper, and calculated to promote justice.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert Robitaille v. P. S. Furguson, Sh'ff, &c.
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal from a justice to the district court dismissed, where notice of the filing of the transcript of appeal was not served on the appellee within five days thereafter, as prescribed by rule 15 of Supreme Court, made pursuant to § 612, Civ. Code; Held, that said rule is still in force.