The opinion of the court was delivered by

This action was commenced in the district court of Cloud county for the purpose of perpetually enjoining the collection of a certain tax. The plaintiff then applied to the judge of the probate court, the judge of the district court being absent from the county, for a temporary injunction to restrain the collection of said tax until the case could finally be heard in the district court. The judge of the probate court refused to grant said temporary injunction, and of that refusal the plaintiff now complains. No application was made to the district court, or to the judge thereof, for a temporary injunction in this case, and no attempt has been made to have the district court or the judge thereof review the order of the probate judge refusing said temporary injunction.

The first question to be considered in this case, and the only one, if we answer this in the negative, is, whether a petition in error will lie to this court from an order of the probate judge refusing a temporary injunction. There is no law that authorizes any such thing. There is a statute that provides that, “The supreme court may also reverse, vacate or modify any of the following orders of the district court, or a judge thereof: First, a final order. Second, an order that grants or refuses a continuance, discharges, vacates or modifies a provisional remedy, or grants, refuses, vacates, or modifies an *228injunction,” etc. (Civil Code, § 542.) This statute provides for and' authorizes the supreme court to review aa order made by the judge of the district court refusing an injunction. But there is no statute that provides for or authorizes the supreme court to review 'any order made by the probate judge.

This petition in error must therefore be dismissed, for want of jurisdiction in the supreme court to adjudicate upon matters involved therein.