Johns v. Hastings & Saxton
Johns v. Hastings & Saxton
22 Kan. 464
Johns v. Hastings & Saxton
Opinion of the Court
This judgment is affirmed as to plaintiff in error Johns, on the authority of Dickson v. Randal, 19 Kas. 212; and reversed as to the other plaintiffs in error, upon the authority of Monger v. Comm’rs of Harvey Co., ante, p. 318.
The costs of this court will be divided between plaintiff in error Johns, and the defendants in error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.