It sufficiently appearing from the testimony that Frank Fargo, upon whom the notice in this case was served, was station and ticket agent of plaintiff in error (defendant below), and that being the only question presented by counsel, the judgment will be affirmed, on the authority of K. P. Rly. Co. v. Ball, 19 Kas. 535; C. B. Rld. Co. v. Ingram, 20 Kas. 66; Union Trust Co. v. Kendall, 20 Kas. 515; Laws 1874, ch. 94, §3, p. 144.