Peacock v. Boyle
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Deets v. Smith (Kan. Ct. App. 1897)
- Sickinger v. State ex rel. Hutchins (Kan. 1891)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action to recover upon a promissory note and to foreclose a land contract, assigned as security for the payment of the note. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff alleges error.
The general finding of the jury is based upon disputed facts and conflicting testimony, and, being approved by the district court, must stand. (K. P. Rly. Co. v. Kunkel, 17 Kas. 145.)
There is nothing substantial in the objection to the rulings of the court on the admission of testimony. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.