Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Collins
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Collins
67 Kan. 821; 72 P. 1097; 1903 Kan. LEXIS 341
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Collins
Opinion of the Court
The brief of counsel for plaintiff in error is devoted chiefly to a discussion of the facts. We have reviewed the testimony and find it ample to sustain the judgment. If the exclusion of the rules of the company was error, we cannot review the action of the trial court for the reason that the excluded rules are not incorporated in the record.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.