Bell v. Lloyd
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chesser v. State (Fla. 1926)
- State v. Taplin (Me. 1968)
- Gibson v. Enright (Kan. 1934)
- Lamb v. State of Florida (Fla. 1926)
- Nickels v. State (Fla. 1923)
- State v. Choquette (Kan. 1921)
- Alexander v. State (Wyo. 1912)
- Daugherty v. Powell (Kan. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendants’ depositions were quashed on motion of plaintiffs. Application was then made by defendants for a continuance of the case, and an affidavit showing diligence filed.’ As showing the meritorious character of the evidence which they expected to produce, the defendants attached to and made a part of their affidavit the depositions which had been quashed. The plaintiffs elected to admit the affidavit and go to trial. They objected to the reading of the depositions as part of the affidavit. The court permitted their reading, and this is alleged as error. We think the court was right. The depositions were specifically referred to as part of the affidavit. ' They were therefore as much a part of it as though they had been copied at length on the paper containing the balance of the affidavit.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.