State v. Krapff
State v. Krapff
71 Kan. 841; 79 P. 1133; 1905 Kan. LEXIS 240
State v. Krapff
Opinion of the Court
The state did not help its case by using the deposition of Peter Krapff, the owner of the property. It was necessary to show knowledge on his part that the premises were used for unlawful purposes. (Cordes v. The State, 37 Kan. 48, 14 Pac. 493). The deposition of the owner tended to disprove this.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.