Coffeyville Gas Co. v. Dooley
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Green v. State Highway Commission (Kan. 1959)
- McIntyre v. Dickinson (Kan. 1957)
- McCarty v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. (Kan. 1954)
- Mathis v. Public School District No. 103 (Kan. 1953)
- Palmer v. Helmer (Kan. 1945)
- Gale v. Fruehauf Trailer Co. (Kan. 1944)
- Heniff v. Clausen (Kan. 1942)
- Brewer v. Harris (Kan. 1938)
- Ford v. Sewell (Kan. 1961)
- Bennett v. National Supply Co. (Kan. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendants in error brought this action to recover for legal services alleged to have been performed by them for the Coffeyville ■ Gas Company upon its request. The defendant as an answer filed
The petition in error does not assign as error the denying of the defendant’s motion for a new trial; therefore no questions arising upon the trial of the cause can be considered by this court. (Struthers v. Fuller, 45 Kan. 735, 26 Pac. 471; Dryden v. C. K. & N. Rly. Co., 47 Kan. 445, 28 Pac. 153; National Bank v. Jaffray, 41 Kan. 691, 19 Pac. 626; Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 Kan. 72, 19 Pac. 327; Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 Pac. 792; Cogshall v. Spurry, 47 Kan. 448, 28 Pac. 154; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 Kan. 129, 23 Pac. 109.)
The errors assigned raise questions arising upon the trial and cannot be considered by this court.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.