Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank
Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank
73 Kan. 793; 83 P. 1116; 1906 Kan. LEXIS 340
Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank
Opinion of the Court
On the authority of Kelso v. Norton, 65 Kan. 778, 70 Pac. 896, 93 Am. St. Rep. 308, and Henthorn v. Security Co., 70 Kan. 808, 79 Pac. 653, this case is affirmed. Under the uncontroverted facts, the only legal right, if any, the plaintiff has in the land in question is to redeem and have an accounting for rents.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.