Bonnewell v. Lowe

Supreme Court of Kansas
Bonnewell v. Lowe, 81 Kan. 196 (Kan. 1909)
106 P. 1002; 1909 Kan. LEXIS 333

Bonnewell v. Lowe

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

In a motion to retax costs the appellant asks to be relieved of any charge for the printing of the counter abstract prepared by the appellees. The original abstract stated the questions of law sought to be raised, followed by so much of the record as was thought to bear upon these questions. The counter abstract contained other portions of the record, only a small part of which, estimated at one-tenth of the whole, appears to have been necessary for the determination of the controversy in this court. The motion is therefore allowed so far as relates to nine-tenths of the charge made for the counter abstract. (Beck v. Lowell, 78 Kan. 101, 104.)

Reference

Full Case Name
L. K. Bonnewell v. J. T. Lowe, as Trustee
Status
Published
Syllabus
Costs — Printing Counter Abstract. Cost of printing a counter abstract retaxed because matter was included not necessary to the decision of the questions of law involved.