The sole question involved in this case is. whether the district court erred in setting aside a tax deed that had been of record more than five years. The only objections made to the deed have recently been held to be unavailing, under substantially similar circumstances. (Kessler v. Polkosky, 81 Kan. 69; Van Hall v. Goertz, 82 Kan. 142; Nesbit v. Bearman, ante, p. 122.) The judgment is therefore reversed.