State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper

Supreme Court of Kansas
State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper, 84 Kan. 446 (Kan. 1911)
113 P. 1058; 1911 Kan. LEXIS 349

State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The judgment in this case must be affirmed for these reasons: The question whether the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial can not be determined because the record does not show any request for one. The case having been heard by the court, any admission of incompetent evidence was not reversible error, if there was competent evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment, and we find that to be the case.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State of Kansas ex rel. Fred S. Jackson, as Attorney-general v. Frank L. Harper
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
HEADNOTE BY THE REPORTER. Practice, Supreme Court — Record—Right to a Jury Trial. Whether the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial could not be determined on review because the record did not show any request for one.