State v. Carroll
State v. Carroll
88 Kan. 407; 128 P. 399; 1912 Kan. LEXIS 76
State v. Carroll
Opinion of the Court
Appellants were adjudged to be guilty of contempt of court in violating an injunction restraining them from keeping and maintaining a nuisance in the Planter’s hotel, in the city of Wichita. The objection that leading questions were asked furnishes no ground for reversal, and the remaining one that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment can not be upheld. ' Under the governing rule, the evidence appears to be ample.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.