Busey v. Stockhoff
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Davis v. Davis (Kan. 1926)
- Gardner v. Anderson (Kan. 1924)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action in ejectment. The defendants had judgment for costs. The plaintiffs appeal.
The case is controlled by the decision just handed down in Ewing v. Nesbitt, ante, p. 708, 129 Pac. 1135, in which it is held that the statute de donis and the rule of the common law expressed therein are in full force and effect in this state, and that an estate tail is capable of being barred by a conveyance of record made by the tenant in tail. It follows therefore that the conveyance made to the defendants by Robert O’Donnell, the sole surviving tenant in tail, and his wife, Huida O’Donnell, barred the issue born and unborn of the tenants in tail as well as the donors’ reversion.
.The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.