Pierson v. Kingman Milling Co.
Pierson v. Kingman Milling Co.
92 Kan. 468; 140 P. 1033; 1914 Kan. LEXIS 258
Pierson v. Kingman Milling Co.
Opinion of the Court
Upon a full consideration of a petition for a rehearing the majority of the court remains of the view indicated in the original opinion. The circumstantial evidence is ■deemed to warrant an inference that the president and vice president, as well as the secretary-treasurer, knew of an arrangement regarding the life employment Of the plaintiff. The fact that all the stock was owned by these thr.ee officers and by
The petition for a rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.