Hill v. Sweet

Supreme Court of Kansas
Hill v. Sweet, 100 Kan. 531 (Kan. 1917)
164 P. 1078; 1917 Kan. LEXIS 367

Hill v. Sweet

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment rendered by default upon service by publication, and permitting defendants to answer in the action. It has been repeatedly held that such an order is not one which can be reviewed while the action is still pending in the district court. McCulloch v. Dodge, 8 Kan. 476.; Flint v. Noyes, 27 Kan. 351, 353; List v. Jockheck, 45 Kan. 349, 27 Pac. 184; Shurtleff v. Chase County, 63 Kan. 645, 652, 66 Pac. 654; Vail v. School District, 86 Kan. 808, 811, 122 Pac. 885.

The appeal is dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Irving Hill and R. E. Protsch, as Bondholders, etc., of the International Improvement Company v. Lou D. Sweet
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published