The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this case, as reported in 121 Kan. 559, 560, 247 Pac. 447, 448, an erroneous citation was given. The sentence as printed reads:

“The proceeding in this case was under R. S. 12-607, et seq., which do not require such a resolution.” (p. 560.)

The citation to the statute was an error; it should have been R. S. 12-617. The error is hereby corrected, on the court’s own motion.