Supreme Court of Kansas, 2006

State v. Marsh

State v. Marsh
Supreme Court of Kansas · Decided October 18, 2006 · Per Curiam
144 P.3d 48; 282 Kan. 38; 2006 Kan. LEXIS 841 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Marsh

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In State v. Marsh, 278 Kan. 520, 102 P.3d 445 (2004), we affirmed appellant’s convictions and sentences for first-degree premeditated murder and aggravated burglary. We reversed appellant’s convictions for capital murder and aggravated arson after holding the trial court committed reversible error by excluding circumstantial evidence connecting a third party, the victim’s husband, to the crimes. A majority of the court also held that the weighing equation, K.S.A. 21-4624(e), was unconstitutional on its face under tire Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court of the United States granted appellee’s petition for writ of certiorari, 544 U.S. 1060, 161 L. Ed. 2d 1109, 125 S. Ct. 2517 (2005), and later reversed this court’s holding that K.S.A. 21-4624(e) is unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163, 165 L. Ed. 2d 429, 126 S. Ct. 2516 (2006).

That part of our decision in State v. Marsh which held K.S.A. 21-4624(e) unconstitutional under tire Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution is hereby vacated. Our decision in Marsh reversing appellant’s convictions for capital murder and aggravated arson and affirming appellant’s convictions and sentences for first-degree premeditated murder and aggravated burglary remains unchanged. The case is remanded with directions to grant appellant a new trial on the capital murder and aggravated arson charges.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.