Pemberton v. Searce
Pemberton v. Searce
Opinion of the Court
The Opinion of the Court. — The fixing a day of payment in the teneri of the bond, is unusual, if not nonsensical, and can only be considered as surplusage — the day of payment being also fixed in the condition ; for if the day fixed in the teneri and condition had been different, that in the condition must govern. The variance stated in the first error, is therefore immaterial ;
Judgment reversed.
(a) 2 Wafh. 134-5.
In Mulroy vs. Hensley, fpring term, 1810, a fimilar variance was held fa, tal on oyer and demurrer.
Quere, and fee Palmer and Cafey vs. M'Ginnefs, poft.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.