In the cafe of the Wickliffes vs. May & Ambroje, on a motion for a ftiperfé-t?eas, fall term 1809, the court.decided that the purchafers of a houfe and lot, fold undera decree of court, were not fuch parties as to entitle them toa writ of error to reverie the order of court madeatthe inftance of the complainant and defendant, fetting afidethe faie, and ordering a new fale.