Fisher v. Mershon
Fisher v. Mershon
Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the Court, by
— This ■suit was brought by Mershon in chancery to recover the amount of a note, destroyed. The bill charges the note to have been destroyed by a neighbor’s child, who by some means got the possession of it; and there having been no answer, the bill was taken for confessed, and a decree for relief pronounced.
We are of opinion the bill contains sufficient allegations to»authorise a decree. It is abundantly evident the nóte was not destroyed by Mershon or through his procurement; and we apprehend it was not incumbent <on him, as seems to be supposed by Fisher’s counsel,
"VVe are of opinion therefore the circumstances of the destruction of the note as stated in the bill are sufficient to authorise a court of chancery to take jurisdiction of the cause, and that Mershon has shewn himself entitled to a decree for the amount of his debt stated in the bill, with interest lrom the time the note became due until it is paid ; but we are of opinion the court erred in decreeing interest-before the note became due, there being nothing in the cause to shew an undertaking on the part of Fisher to that effect; and for that cause the decree must be reversed, each party paying h s own costs, and the cause remanded for a decree to be entered conformable to this opinion. .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.