Jones v. Lacey
Jones v. Lacey
26 Ky. 543; 3 J.J. Marsh. 543; 1830 Ky. LEXIS 115
Jones v. Lacey
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The circuit court erred in overruling the demurrer to the replication to the plea in abatement.
That a non-resident plaintiff had not given security for costs, is good matter, in abatement of his writ. When that fact is well pleaded in abatement, as was done in this case, a replication, tendering a bond for costs, or averring that the security had been given since the impetration of the writ, is insufficient.
It admits the truth of the plea; and the plea being true, its effect cannot be evaded.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause .remanded, with instructions to sustain the demurrer,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.