Robertson's Heirs v. M'Daniel
Robertson's Heirs v. M'Daniel
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Jennings Robertson died intestate, leaving eight infant children, and a widow, and, among other articles of property, two slaves. M’Daniel hav-' ing afterwards married one of the daughters, filed a hill in chancery, in conjunction with his wife, for a sale pf the slaves, and distribution of the proceeds.
The answers resist the sale and distribution on the ground that such a course would be disagreeable and injurious.
But, on the bill and answers, the circuit court allotted one of the slaves to the widow for dower, and decreed the sale of the other.
The defendants below prosecute this writ of error to feverse that decree.
The decree is erroneous for the following reasons.
1st. There is no evidence of the value of the slaves; and, therefore, the court erred in decreeing one of them to the widow.
2d. It has not been shown, that there could be no administration. A sale and distribution should not be decreed, unless the personal representative, if there be one, be made a party; if there be none, one should be appointed and made a party, unless such appointment bo impracticable.
If, as suggested in one of the answers, the intestate died in "Virginia and the slaves were then in Virginia,
Whether, if the slaves were brought from Virginia by the widow, her dower in them, has heen thereby forfeited, is a question which may occur in the further progress of the case, in the]inferior court, hut is not now presented for consideration.
Decree reversed, and cause remanded, for further proceedings, according to this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.