Currant v. Currant
Currant v. Currant
Opinion of the Court
OPINION op the Court by
The default admitted that the appellant owes more than the amount claimed by the appellee in this case, and the joint judgment cannot operate prejudicially to the appellant. Nor, though it would have been more prudent and regular to have directed a credit in favor of the appellant as garnishee, yet as the record will always secure him that credit the omission to direct it specially as the decree cannot do him any harm.
The appellant having made no resistance was not liable personally for costs, and apparently therefore the judgment against him for costs might be erroneous, but so small a matter ought not to reverse the entire judgment as the judgment for costs is,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.