Warner v. Hazelrigg's Admr.
Warner v. Hazelrigg's Admr.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
The commissioner in his report in this case (it being a petition in equity for the settlement of the estate of Hazelrigg) reports adversely to the claim- of the appellant Warner. Exceptions were filed by Warner to that part of the report excluding his claim and those exceptions were overruled. From the order overruling the exceptions, this appeal is prosecuted. An appeal cannot be prosecuted from a judgment or order that is not final and in the case of Apperson v. Bondurant, 4 Metcalf, page 30, this court decided that although a question of law and fact relating to final relief had been decided, still to make it complete the judgment must give the relief asked for. In the case, supra, the court adjudges that, “upon all the bills where Bondurant was an original party, whether as drawer or endorser, he must share equally the loss with Anderson and such is the judgment of the court upon the question involved.” This court held that such a judgment was not final and dismissed the appeal in the case of Philips v. Alcorn, 4 J. J. Marshall, page
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.