Hurst v. Stone
Hurst v. Stone
6 Ky. Op. 129; 1872 Ky. LEXIS 455
Hurst v. Stone
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mrs. Hurst did not hold the lot mortgaged to appellees as separate estate, although the title was conveyed to a trustee. It being general estate, she had the power in conjunction with her husband to bind it by mortgage, to secure the payment of the husband’s debt. Sharp’s Adm’r v. Proctor’s Adm’r and Heirs, 5 Bush 396.
The court below did not e.rr in enforcing the mortgage, and the judgment must be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.