Boothe v. Shrout's Adm'r
Boothe v. Shrout's Adm'r
8 Ky. Op. 61; 1874 Ky. LEXIS 350
Boothe v. Shrout's Adm'r
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
A part of one of appellee’s depositions is missing from the record, and the clerk certifies that it is missing from his office; and as the decision of the case depends wholly upon questions of fact, we are bound by a well-established rule, often recognized by this court, to presume, in the absence of a part of the evidence heard by the court of original jurisdiction, that the judgment is right.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.