Maxey v. Commonwealth
Maxey v. Commonwealth
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Instruction No. 5, given at the instance of the attorney for the commonwealth, was misleading, and especially upon the facts appearing in the case. There was no eye witness to the killing, and the jury could not well determine the condition or attitude of the
'Instruction No. 1, given at the instance of the defense, is more easily understood by a jury and needs no explanation. The legal mind can understand the legal import of instruction No. 5, but one not skilled in the law might conclude that instruction No. 5 was in conflict with instruction No. 1. Tha jury should have been told, also, that in their deliberations on the facts, if they believed beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was guilty, and also doubted as to the degree of the offense, they must find him guilty of the lesser offense. The jurors, or some of them, under the instructions, may have doubted as to whether the offense was murder or manslaughter, and yet they were not told what their verdict should be in such a state of case. The court is required to give the law of the case. Blair v. Commonwealth, 7 Bush 227.
For the reasons indicated the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to award a new trial, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.