Mackey v. Owsley
Mackey v. Owsley
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
We incline to the opinion that the price of digging wells is due when the work is received by the proper authority, and an apportionment is made and warrants issued, unless a different time of payment is agreed upon. The ordinance seems to contemplate that the work shall be received when completed, and the provision that the well shall continue for the space of one year from the time it is received, to furnish five feet of water, was not intended to postpone the time of payment, but to render the contractor liable on his bond
But the petition was fatally defective in failing to allege that the ordinance was published as required by charter.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.