Commonwealth v. Gee
Commonwealth v. Gee
10 Ky. Op. 682; 1 Ky. L. Rptr. 281; 1880 Ky. LEXIS 313
Commonwealth v. Gee
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The omission of the word “weapon” did not render the indictment bad. It is alleged that the offense charged was committed by carrying concealed upon and about his person a deadly weapon. This was sufficient for all purposes. Besides this, the word “weapon” should be supplied. The words, “the offense of carrying concealed a deadly-,” unmistakably indicate the omitted word, and enable the court to supply it with absolute certainty.
Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.