Opinion of the Court? by

Affirming,

On April 7, 1906, Helen Irvine, a little girl 12 years old, who lived near Yamallton, in Fayette county, went, about 3 o ’clock in the afternoon, to a store there? with some eggs in a bucket. As she went to the store, 'she met Columbus Davis, a boy then 15 years old, in a buggy. After she delivered the eggs and stayed a1 *455the store some little time, she started home. As she went along, she found the buggy hitched at the side of the pike. Davis was behind a rock fence in some bushes, and jumped up and grabbed her, and while he held her commenced unbuttoning his pants in front without saying anything. She then hit him across the hand with the bucket. He let her go, and she went in the house of a Mrs. Waite, who lived near by. She told Mrs. Waite what had occurred. She and Mrs. Waite then went out to the pike, and as Davis drove up Davis started to say something. Mrs. Waite said: “If you don’t go away, I will blow your head off.” He then said: “I was not trying to do anything to that little girl.” She said: “Who said you were?” And he did not say anything more. The officer who arrested Davis testified as follows: “He told me he was up at Yarnallton, and drove off the road to keep the horse from scaring at the train, and he was standing there, and a little boy came along, and he asked-him for a match, and the little boy said: ‘Your horse has got mud on his legs.’ And at that the little girl ran up to a neighbor’s house, and they came out and threatened to kill him.” Davis was indicted under section 1158, Ky. Stats., 1903: “Whoever shall unlawfully take or detain any woman against her will, with intent to marry such woman, or have her married to another, or with intent to have carnal knowledge with her himself, or that another shall have such knowledge, shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than seven years.” He was found guilty, and his punishment was fixed at seven years confinement in the penitentiary. He was positively identified by the girl and Mrs. Waite, and his statement to the officer confirms their testimony as to his identity. There was no error in the admission of *456evidence/ and our attention has not been called to any error in the instructions. There was evidence sufficient to take the case to the jury, and no evidence was offered for the prisoner, except to show his age, 15 years, or that he would he 16 the following Christmas.

It is earnestly insisted that the court should not have sent him to the penitentiary, hut should have sent him to the the house of reform. The statute is as follows: “When any hoy or girl is brought before any' circuit court, or in cities of the first or second .class, police court, being under the age of eighteen years, it shall he lawful for such court, <jr any of them, in its discretion, to commit such boy or girl to said houses of reform for any period of time not exceeding the minority of such child, in the following cases: * * * -Upon conviction in any of the said courts of any crime, penal offense or violation of any law of this State, or ordinances of any city, and the punishment fixed at fifteen days or . more imprisonment in the penitentiary, county oí city jail.” Ky. Stats., 1903, section 2095a, subsection 13. There is nothing in the act of 1906 which modifies or changes this statute. It is left to the discretion of the court to commit the offender to the penitentiary or to the house of reform. The defendant was practically 16 years of age at the time of the trial. He was before the court. Many hoys of 16 are practically grown, and the court in each case must decide from the maturity of the prisoner and other circumstances what is the proper course to pursue. We have nothing before us but the bare fact of the prisoner’s age and the circumstances of the offense. Prom these we cannot say that the circuit court abused a sound discretion in sending the prisoner to the penitentiary.

Judgment affirmed.