Woodruff v. Goldbach
Woodruff v. Goldbach
Opinion of the Court
Response of the Court to Petition for Rehearing by
Withdrawing Opinion and Reversing.
In the petition for re-hearing, we are advised that the county judge had exercised the authority given by section 331-e, sub-section 17, Ky. Statutes, and appointed a stenographer to his said court. It is alleged that the appointment of appellee was made, in fact, by the fiscal court and not by the county court, as authorized by the act, and copies of the orders on the county court record filed by agreement with the petition for rehearing show this allegation to be true. The original petition was so drawn that it was not made plain that the appointment of appellee was made by the fiscal court, and as there was no-intimation in said petition that any appointment had been
It is now withdrawn and the case is reversed, as to appellee G-oldbach, for the reasons given in the opinion of Woodruff v. Shae, and remanded, with instructions to the trial judge to overrule the demurrer to the petition.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.