Farmer v. Commonwealth
Farmer v. Commonwealth
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, convicted of the offense denounced by KRS 242.230, which provides that “No person in dry territory shall sell * * * any alcoholic beverage”, moves for an appeal. In brief it is complained that the court committed four prejudicial errors. We have considered them all and find only one point meritorious. That one (D) correctly asserts that the indictment is fatally- defective ■ in failing to allege the sale was made in dry or local option territory.
It is fair to say that counsel for the Commonwealth admit the insufficiency of the indictment, and make no criticism of the cases above cited.
The motion for an appeal is sustained and the judgment is reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.