Barnette v. Mullins
Barnette v. Mullins
286 S.W.2d 553
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Barnette v. Mullins
Opinion of the Court
The appellants, Cecil Barnette and wife, have moved for an appeal under KRS 21.-080 from a judgment establishing the boundary line between their lot and a lot of the appellees, Creed Mullins and wife, and denying damages for trespass. The suit is over a wedge of land 18 or 24 inches wide at
The court has given careful consideration to the merits of the case and reached the conclusion that the judgment is sustained by the evidence.
Wherefore, the motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.