Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1956

Richmond v. Commonwealth

Richmond v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Decided November 30, 1956
296 S.W.2d 219 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Richmond v. Commonwealth

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted in the Muhlenberg Circuit Court of selling alcoholic beverages in local option territory, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment of 60 days in jail. He appeals, contending that the court erred: (1) in failing to grant his motion for a continuance, and (2) in overruling his motion for a new trial.

An examination of the record convinces us that the court properly overruled his motion for a continuance and his motion for a new trial.

The motion’ for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.