DeWitte v. Gomez

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

DeWitte v. Gomez

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at LONDON

RANDALL C. DEWITTE, ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil No. 6: 21-61-HRW ) V. ) ) GOMEZ, Warden, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Respondent. )

*** *** *** *** Federal inmate Randall DeWitte has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging the calculation of his sentence by the Bureau of Prisons. [D. E. No. 1] The Court has reviewed the petition and the materials DeWitte has filed in support of it pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2243

, and will deny the petition for several reasons. DeWitte did not pay the $5.00 filing fee required by

28 U.S.C. § 1914

, and he did not file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. DeWitte therefore failed to properly initiate an action in this Court, warranting denial of his petition. He also did not exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. DeWitte filed a “cop-out” in February 2021 regarding his sentence computation, but was told that it was still being reviewed by the Designation and Sentence Computation Center. [D. E. No. 1-3] If DeWitte wishes to challenge his sentence computation in this Court, he must first follow the BOP’s Inmate Grievance Program, satisfying its procedural rules and meeting its deadlines. Fazzini v. Northeast Ohio Correctional Center,

473 F.3d 229, 231

(6th Cir. 2006). This includes a formal grievance to the

warden, an appeal to the Mid-Atlantic Regional Office, and an appeal to the Central Office. Finally, DeWitte’s petition does not adequately explain the basis for his claim. He asserts that his criminal judgment “clearly states that petitioner’s time

began to run on March 6, 2017,” [D. E. No. 1 at 7], but it plainly does not. See [D. E. No. 1-1] By federal statute the Bureau of Prisons (not the sentencing judge) calculates the federal sentence, including its commencement date and any applicable sentence credits. Thus DeWitte’s petition does not provide sufficient factual

background or legal argument to explain why he thinks the BOP’s calculation is incorrect. The Court will therefore deny the petition. Once DeWitte completes the

inmate grievance process, he may file an entirely new petition regarding his concerns if he chooses to do so, addressing each of the matters described above. He may obtain appropriate forms from the Clerk’s Office. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Randall DeWitte’s habeas corpus petition [D. E. No. 1] is DENIED. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket. This 19th day of April, 2021.

Reference

Status
Unknown