Oiler v. LeMaster
Oiler v. LeMaster
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND
CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-90-DLB
DAVID CHANNING OILER PETITIONER
VS. MEMORANDUM ORDER
WARDEN LEMASTER RESPONDENT
*** *** *** *** Federal inmate David Oiler filed a pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241in which he argues that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) incorrectly determined that he is ineligible to earn First Step Act (FSA) time credits. (Doc. # 1). The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Kentucky entered an appearance on behalf of the Respondent and filed a Response in Opposition to Oiler’s Petition. (Doc. # 6). Oiler then filed a Reply. (Doc. # 8). Thus, this matter is now ripe for a decision. The Court has fully reviewed the parties’ submissions and will deny Oiler’s request for relief. Petitioner Oiler was convicted of multiple federal crimes in the District of South Carolina, including, but not limited to, racketeering in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), narcotics conspiracy in violation of
21 U.S.C. §§ 841and 846, money laundering in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 924(c). (See Docs. # 6 and 6-1). Oiler was sentenced to a total of 200 months imprisonment. (See id.). 1 The Court recognizes that the FSA allows a prisoner to earn time credits towards pre-release custody or supervised release if he successfully participates in evidence- based recidivism reduction programs and other productive activities. See
18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4). However, the FSA also provides that a prisoner is ineligible to receive such time credits if he is serving a sentence for a disqualifying offense. And that statute
specifically includes possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) as one such disqualifying offense. See
id.at § 3632(d)(4)(D)(xxii). Given Oiler’s conviction under § 924(c), the BOP determined that he was ineligible to earn FSA time credits. (See Doc. # 6-1 at 33). Oiler does not dispute the foregoing facts. Instead, Oiler suggests that he is not yet serving time for his § 924(c) conviction. (See Docs. # 1 and 8). His argument is misplaced. Title
18, U.S. Code Section 3584(c) provides that the BOP shall aggregate multiple prison sentences “for administrative purposes,” and many courts, including this one, have upheld the BOP’s decision to aggregate sentences for FSA time credit
purposes. See, e.g., Ledford v. LeMaster, No. 0:23-cv-030-DLB,
2023 WL 2905376(E.D. Ky. 2023); Keeling v. LeMaster, No. 0:22-cv-096-GFVT,
2022 WL 17407966(E.D. Ky. 2022). For this reason, the BOP acted within its discretion in determining that Oiler was ineligible to earn FSA credits. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Oiler’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241(Doc. # 1) is DENIED; (2) This action is STRICKEN from the Court’s docket; and (3) The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. 2 This 20th day of December, 2023. Kye. Signed By: We. 9 David L. Bunning DE “Sims □□□ United States District Judge K:\DATA\ORDERS\PSO Orders\0-23-90 Oiler Memorandum.docx
Reference
- Status
- Unknown